Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Is the Equality and Human Rights Commission trying to “forget” trans people?

In 1996 the European Court of Justice issued an important judgement which compelled the United Kingdom to update the Sex Discrimination Act so as to outlaw rampant employment and education discrimination towards people who intend to undergo, are undergoing or have undergone Gender Reassignment.

The Sex Discrimination (Gender Reassignment) Regulations were eventually enacted in April 1999. Even so, research conducted for Trevor Phillips' Equalities Review and published in February 2007 showed that, among 872 trans people questioned, 42% said they had lived in fear of workplace discrimination when they needed to transition. (Engendered Penalties: Transgender and Transsexual People's Experiences of Inequality and Discrimination; Whittle, Turner and Al-Alami; Equalities Review; Feb 2007).

Ten years after the law was introduced, transsexual people continue to describe instances of discrimination. Meanwhile transgender people are not even protected, because they don't fulfil the law's criterion that changes in one's gender presentation must be under medical supervision in order to count.

That same year (1999), the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier High Court judgement against North West Lancashire Health Authority and in favour of three transsexual women who had been denied NHS treatment for their condition. The Court ruled that gender reassignment treatment was the proper clinical response to the condition described as 'gender dysphoria' and that it was unlawful for any NHS organisation to operate any system of control which amounted to a blanket ban.

Ten years after that judgement and in spite of countless guidance publications from the Department of Health, several Primary Care Trusts and whole regions of the country persist in operating policies which do amount, in effect, to blanket bans. Their rules, when obtained under Freedom of Information procedures, read like a travesty of the founding principles of the National Health Service.

In 2002 the Royal College of Psychiatrists, in conjunction with the Royal Society of Medicine, set out to draft the first set of guidelines for the care of trans people by clinicians in the UK. A draft was published widely for consultation in November 2006 and attracted dozens of critical comments. The clinicians on the committee drafting the guidelines could not reach agreement with stakeholders, who pointed out that many of the proposed provisions were in fact discriminatory and unlawful on a succession of grounds. The guidelines were sent to a Barrister by the Royal Colleges, where they remain to this day. Seven years after setting out to produce guidelines, there are still none.

I could continue, but you get the gist. In spite of a succession of legal judgements upholding the rights of trans people in the UK (including a unanimous decision by the European Court of Human Rights in July 2002) they remain subjected to constant oppression and abuse of the same basic rights expected by everyone else.

And so that brings us to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

The EHRC came into existence in October 2007. It replaced three previously separate commissions dealing with the discrimination of people on grounds of their Race, Gender or Disabilities. The remit of the new commission requires them to tackle issues related to gender; gender identity; race or ethnic background; disability; sexual orientation; age, religion or belief. If you add those up then it comes to seven so-called "strands".

Even before they opened their doors, trans activists were worried about whether EHRC seriously recognised trans issues as something specifc. One moment the commission's chair, Trevor Phillips, asserted publicly that trans people were specifically there on the list, as a seventh category. The next moment different members of his staff would try to slip trans people into one of the other categories – gender or sexual orientation – where the distinct issues of trans life would immediately be forgotten.

And that's the way it has remained – vague and equivocal.

If you visit the EHRC's web site then the invisibility of trans people is quickly evident. "Transgender" is mentioned as a standard throwaway line in the standard "Notes to Editors" that go on the bottom of every commission press release. Yet it is impossible to find any commission press release which specifically addresses any of the battles which trans people still face in the most basic aspects of life – protection from discrimination; access to healthcare; freedom from human rights abuses.

The inactivity is carefully concealed though. A visitor to the commission's web site probably won't notice that there are conveniently generated news feeds for every other category of discrimination but none for transgender people. That's because the commission would have nothing to place on that feed and it would be ... well ... embarrassingly obvious.

A few weeks ago I wrote and pointed this issue out to an EHRC middle manager whom I deal with. The result? Absolute silence. This week I therefore decided to take action.

I am now actively pursuing a complaint about EHRC's inaction and cover up. And these are the issues which I have demanded they address. Addressing Trevor Phillips and his team of managers I have demanded:

  • set yourself the goals that trans people in Britain should no longer suffer a postcode lottery for funding of the most basic health care provision and
  • commission the most basic of all research – to find out, with a degree of certainty, (a) how many transsexual, transgender and other gender variant people live in the UK; (b) how many require care relating to their gender issues (not just those who present seeking surgery); and (c) how many are not getting that care or suffer unreasonable waiting times or denial of service choice
  • quiz the Royal Colleges on why they have dragged their feet for seven years and have still not published basic standards of care for the UK (they're afraid their discriminatory protocols are unlawful)
  • demand to know why there is no published, peer reviewed research on the outcomes of trans care in the UK (and why less than 0.098% of articles recently searched in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO relate to UK research on LGB&T health as a whole.)
  • Proactively audit EIA's on PCT commissioning policies at random and use judicial review to overturn cynical discriminatory practice predicated on the above lack of data – a locked in form of institutional discrimination if ever there was a case
  • Take up the case of the UK's backward practice on prescription of hormone blocking treatment of teenage trans people as the travesty of ethics and the Human Rights abuse that it represents
  • Ensure that all police forces are monitoring transphobic hate crime.
  • Put transphobic bullying in schools into the educational vocabulary
  • Actively investigate the reasons why trans people are living on benefits and why those in work are known to be paid several grades below their capability.
  • Criticise media organisations when their editors still persist in allowing transphobic language to air (especially from comics of dubious talent).
  • Investigate and report on why the trans community's tiny support and advocacy organisations are close to collapse – their leaders physically and spiritually exhausted after nearly 20 years of voluntary work

In concluding this call I also said,

"I would like to see some action. In particular I would like to see a national lead on the issues I've listed below, by someone whose annual job appraisal and public assessment depends on making concrete progress on issues that are simply allowed to drag on, unaddressed."

"The time for patting trans people on the head and throwing occasional scraps is gone. And I'm tired of seeing former colleagues beating themselves ragged doing work that the Commission itself should be doing. We're all now too old for that, and we've all been exploited for too long."

"The Equality and Human Rights Commission is now being directly measured on what it achieves – this week, this month, this year"

Tonight I received an assurance from a regional manager that she would be looking into these issues.

Let's hope she does more than look; for trans people in Britain have been looking at those issues for far longer than necessary already. And the body they should have been able to expect to champion their plight has brushed them under the carpet.

Update: See the reply from EHRC Chief Executive Nicola Brewer

9 comments:

Kitten said...

Christine< it is so good to see you continuing your fight on behalf of the trans community, and I pray that your words will be enough to finally shame and force those that have a duty to see our rights are as others in this world.

Femina Street

Natasha Thoday said...

The EHRC's "inaction and cover up" is echoed at local government level. In a different twist the former EOC funded and won two transgender cases against Brighton & Hove City Council. The EHRC then put a report up on their web site but refused to issue a press released despite being lobbied very hard to do so: -

http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/yourrights/equalityanddiscrimination/gender/atwork/Transgenderissues/Pages/transsexualismcasedecisions.aspx

Latest news and background information on the Council’s refusals to answer basic Public Interest questions has been put up on a web site that tracks:-

• Why senior staff lied and threatened when their actions were questioned?
• What the public cost is?
• Why they refuse to Acknowledge or Withdraw prejudice and damaging statements about transgender people?
• Why No Apology?

Here is a link to the web site: -
http://brighton-council-cover-up-transgender.blogspot.com/

A petition has also been set up to get the City Council to disclose how much Public Money they spent fighting the two un-winnable Employment Tribunal cases. If you have not yet done so, please DO sign it yourself. Thanks in advance! Here is a link to the petition: -

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/freedom-of-information-brighton-hove-council/sign.html

And here are links to some recent news coverage: -

http://www.pinke.biz/news/488/Brighton-Hove-Found-Guilty-of-Transgender-Discrimination/
http://foxstales.blogspot.com/2008/11/think-youre-above-law-think-again.html
http://www.gscene.com/blog/2008/11/natasha-thoday-talks-to-richard-smith_10.html
http://www.gscene.com/blog/2008/11/guilty-on-6-counts.html
http://www.gscene.com/blog/2008/11/natasha-thoday-claims-tribunal-victory.html

Anonymous said...

Hi Christine,

Just getting a job as a transsexual woman where I live is difficult enough.

I have done diversity work with local police, and during this training programme, one let slip that the force employs no transsexuals, that it knew of anyway. I personally have applied for 8 jobs with the force, and not even had an interview out of them.

Can I definately say that I am not being interviewd for jobs, because they know I am TS from the work I have done with them, I will let others decide that.

However, I have also assisted local Council, NHS and Housing company, applied for jobs with these organisations too, and guess what, no interviews there either.

So a pattern is emerging me thinks, do diversity work with local govt, housing, police, NHS etc, which all have gender equality duty/schemes in operation, you will be marked as ts, and will not get the job.

As for the EHRC sidelining trans issues, we can hardly be surprised when the Rev Joel Edwards, former general director of the Evangelical Alliance was elected to the committee of the EHRC. As director of the Evangelical Alliance, he campaigned and lobbied government against recent gay, lesbian and transgender rights legistration including the 2007 & 2008 goods and services amendments to the SDA. Sadly the government defended this decision to elect him, so we shouldn't be surprised at the EHRC's sidelining of trans people.

Recently on the BBC's "Most Annoying People 2008", there were 2 transsexual related articles, and there were some vile comments from the guests, including 2 gaydar radio presenters, and a BBC graphic operator placed an arrow on the screen, pointing to a trans woman's face with the text "stubble".

We have a long way to go to get true equality, I have heard on the grapevine that a Tory backbencher has tabled a private members bill to scrap all discrimination and equality law, watch this space.

Steph

Jess said...

The postcode lottery for trans care needs to be fought, and the EHRC seems like the right organisation to tackle it - or at least raise the questions - but the opportunities are being wasted which is a great shame.

@Steph - I resigned from the Evangelical Alliance some years ago over their treatment of Jeffrey John and his being hounded out from Reading. Alas its an organisation that only knows sympathy and care on its own narrow terms. Oddly, the church I used to attend was very close to the EA and I just come off the phone with the minister - I need to go in and see him and explain, before he retires, why I've not darkened its doors for 18 months (need as in my need: closure) - will be an interesting conversation.

Sophie zealot said...

Hello Christine

It seems that Joel Edwards has a lot of explaining to do. I have come across him before, and find him to be a pain quite frankly.

Shalom

Sophie

Anonymous said...

Hi Christine,

could you possibly add, as a demand to be made of the EHRC that all transgendered people should be give protection against discrimination, not only transsexuals, and be included in the Equality Bill.

It is time they were given a big kick up the derriere however, they seem to be treating us with a large degree of condescension, leaving themselves open to the charge of supporting a hierarchy of discrimination.

Natacha Kennedy

Sunbird said...

I've just had my email today from them in relation to their consultation and discovered that they have shared my name and email address with a third party company to analyse data. Something deeply concerning for any trassexual person who is in stealth of any degree. We also have to contact that third party to discuss any errors in how our comments have been grouped. Essentially, in order to fully participate in their consulations, we are forced to out ourselves to a third party, commercial organisation.

And if a transsexual person has a complaint against the EHRC (which could lead to them needing to reveal that they have a GRC) they don't even provide contact details for a named individual to handle that complaint. Our personal details will just rattle around in EHRC crossing several desks no doubt, not withstanding the fact that EHRC haven't given any apparent thought to their own obligations under GRA22.

I've had enough and will be submitting a formal complaint of discrmination against them. It's about time they realise that discrimination law and privacy law also applies to the GRA's own conduct and that they have a statutory duty to uphold it.

They really don't seem to have a clue how to deal with trans people, especially the significant numbers who are stealth or in the closet.

Anonymous said...

Dear Christine, while I am not trans, I had the temerity to ask EHRC if it was only the select few - immigrants, terrorists and like minorites, prisoners, et al who were entitled to HR and anti-discrim. I did not realise it should have been phrased rhetorically. I am 65 years old, vulnerable female disabled and enforced to live in my car since Aug '08; possibly ad infinitum or until I expire - I thought from Dartmoor's wild and worst winter - but could be thuggery attack, lack of sleep, food, whatever or until my age, disability, sheer bloodied fingers from trying to hang on, whatever eventually kills me off! I enclosed a synopsis of areas of blatant discrimination-cum hr failings by my local authority. In short, what a b***** waste of time and money*** this (and other ostensible organisations are - eg, LGO!). *** Daily Mail had an article that they are 'utilising' too much budget (not verbatim). Keep up your fight, and good luck. I guess my consolation is my car does have a convenient coffin shape to it - joke, OK (I think?) Regards sallyhargreaves29@yahoo.com

Alecia Madonado said...


I am Alecia used every single spell worker on the internet, spent untold amounts of money and discovered they are all fakes…i was the fool though; doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. In the end, I decided that I wanted a tarot reading to know what my future held for me; I contacted a woman who lives locally to me and she told me about a man named (Dr Abalaka); he does not advertise on the internet, has another job for income, has no set prices, makes no false promises and refuses to help anyone that cannot be helped and even helps for free sometimes, he will give you proof before taking money. He is a wonderful man and he was the only person who actually gave me real results. I really hope he doesn’t mind me advertising his contact on the internet but I’m sure any help/ extra work will benefit him.contact him as dr.abalaka@outlook.com He travel sometimes.love marriage,finance, job promotion ,gambling voodoo,lottery Voodoo,poker voodoo,golf Voodoo,Law & Court case Spells,money voodoo,weigh loss voodoo,any sicknesses voodoo,Trouble in marriage,it’s all he does Hope this helps everyone that is in a desperate situation as I once was; I know how it feels to hold onto something and never have a chance to move on because of the false promises and then to feel trapped in wanting something
more. his cell phone number 5182932141 !